The Second Act — The Perils of Parody

Print Article

Not everyone knows this about me, but I have a playful streak. Some might even call me mischievous. Generally this goes pretty much unnoticed. Recently I started playing with music but backed off when I learned it might end me up in prison. Mischievous, indeed!

Okay, my misdeed (or in this case, I suppose I should call it my infringement) resulted from my mischievous tendency to mess with song lyrics. Well, maybe I should come clean and call it my tendency to completely rewrite song lyrics.

So how did I get into trouble? Say I want to perform a song. I buy a copy of the music and this gives me a license to sing it. To myself. If I want to perform it, that is to sing it for others to hear, I have to buy a performance license (or sing it in a bar that has purchased blanket performance rights). Thatís all pretty straightforward. I can even buy rights, for a relatively nominal fee, to make and sell recordings of the song. Itís just money.

But, say I want to change the lyrics. Then it gets sticky. Because changing the lyrics makes it a ďderivative work.Ē To make a derivative work I need permission from the owner of the original copyright. Who in all likelihood, is someone other than the publisher or the distributor who sold me the music. And to be realistic, whatís the chance that Sir Elton John is going to give me permission to screw with his song?

Okay, I havenít infringed on any of Eltonís songs. But letís consider the rules here. Copyright is the law. Write a song and you own it for a really long time. And you donít have to let anybody mess with it. Unless theyíre parodying it. Then thereís a loophole.

Most of my alternate lyrics are funny. Lyrics can be funny because they parody the original song or artist, because they offer a satirical commentary on someone other than the artist, or because theyíre just funny. Funny and satirical donít cut it. The defense is a form of Fair Use. Fair Use means sort of what it sounds like, but you have to understand that almost the entire legal profession exists to define the word ďfair.Ē Parody refers to a work that subjects the song, the artist, or the original workís copyright owner to ridicule. It is considered fair use because the lawmakers figured a parodist would have difficulty exercising the right to free speech if he or she had to ask permission of everyone he wanted to ridicule. So itís granted automatically. But when itís just funny or satirical, well itís assumed that asking permission might be reasonable.

Letís consider a couple of possible transgressions. I say possible because Iíve never connected the lyrics to the music in a public venue (other than for educational reasons, as I do here). I have a stage musical in my head, Westside Story, a parody of the still popular musical by a similar name, but about two rival geriatric gangs residing in the Westside Assisted Living Facility. Say I have a character named Tony, an aging member of the Vets gang. I give him a song with lyrics like these set to the tune of Maria:

Magnesia, I canít find the Milk of Magnesia.

And suddenly Iíve found, the bottle on the ground, empty.

Thatís parody. Iím making fun of the original song. Instead of longing for a beautiful woman, Tony now lusts for an elixir to stimulate his bowels. Itís funny and itís funny because it pokes fun at the original song.

But consider a member of the rival gang, the Sharks. A cranky old geezer named Don who they call Donald the Grump. His song, to the tune of Tonight, goes like this:

Iím right, Iím right, Iím almost always right.

I canít recall Iíve ever been wrong.

Yes, itís funny. But itís funny because it lampoons a politician with a like-sounding name and demeanor. Thatís satire. And satire isnít protected.

It gets really complicated and I think you have to be a copyright attorney to write parody. If thereís an upside here, itís that the copyright statutes are civil, not criminal. This means I wonít go to jail for writing my musical. And the statutory damages top out at about $150,000 per infringement.

I feel so much better.

David Vale is not a lawyer. His legal experience comes from watching television and hiring lawyers when he gets in trouble. He frequently sings his parodies. In the shower.

Print Article

Read More

Judge allows case against neo-Nazi publisher to proceed


November 14, 2018 at 3:39 pm | HELENA, Mont. (AP) ó A federal judge in Montana says the First Amendment does not shield a neo-Nazi website publisher from being sued for telling his readers to unleash a "troll storm" that...


Read More

PHOTOS: Harlem Globetrotters wow crowd at Glacier High

November 14, 2018 at 2:55 pm | Daily Inter Lake The Harlem Globetrotters entertained a giant crowd as they took on the Washington Generals at Glacier High School in Kalispell on Tuesday night. ...


Read More

Letters to the editor Nov. 12

November 14, 2018 at 11:45 am | Daily Inter Lake A little due praise Yesterday, Nov. 7, while walking the Rails to Trails I had a heart-warming experience regarding a Montana Department of Transportation plow truck driver. As my little dog and I...


Read More

Leadership irrespective of political party

November 14, 2018 at 11:45 am | Daily Inter Lake President Trump is contemplating replacing Secretary of Defense, retired Marine Corps General Jim Mattis, apparently based upon Trumpís observation, ďI think heís sort of a Democrat . . .Ē It is gen...


Read More

Contact Us

(406) 755-7000
727 East Idaho
Kalispell, MT 59901

©2018 Daily Inter Lake Terms of Use Privacy Policy