Schools fear lack of funding

Share
Send this page to your friends
Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Thursday, December 20, 2007 1:00 am | Updated: 2:12 pm, Mon Jul 13, 2009.

Unless the Montana Legislature intervenes, many of the state's school districts are months away from disaster.

That's the message that districts, including Columbia Falls, want to impress on the public and on local legislators. Schools across the state are facing significant budget shortfalls at the beginning of the next fiscal year, which starts July 1, 2008.

All told, schools may need voters to approve between $14.5 million and $19.6 million in levies just to maintain current programs.

The Legislature did increase this year's school funding by 8 percent. But next year's increase is just 1.9 percent - far short of a projected inflation of 4.3 percent, Columbia Falls Superintendent Michael Nicosia said.

"The second year in the biennium is a train wreck," he said. "We've been saying it since before the end of the last legislative session."

Now people outside the field of education are telling lawmakers that funding is inadequate, he added.

"It's not School District 6, or the Montana Quality Education Coalition or Dr. Michael Nicosia saying that," he said. "It's the people employed by the state to do this saying it's a train wreck, and the only way you can solve it is by a special legislative session."

Without that session and a vote to increase school spending, he said, schools across the state will see shortfalls in the next fiscal year. Billings' elementary schools, which form the largest public school district in the state, face a deficit of up to $2.9 million. The district can ask voters for an $870,000 levy, but that still leaves a huge shortfall.

Closer to home, the Columbia Falls School District faces a deficit of anywhere from $259,272 to $378,567. Most of that would happen at the elementary level, Nicosia said, which can only levy about $43,000.

If there is no special session and the feared shortfalls become reality, Nicosia doesn't know what the district will do. Columbia Falls already has tightened the belt considerably.

"We've cut so much over the years," he said.

The custodial staff is as low as it can get, he said. Most of the district's para-educators are supported by money outside the general fund budget, and "those that are, are needed," he said.

The district could draw a line with employee negotiations, Nicosia said, but the valley's relatively high cost of living already makes it difficult to attract qualified applicants.

"If we draw the line in the sand, we're hurting ourselves and we're hurting our kids," he said. "If we cut personnel and projects, we're hurting our kids."

Other local districts may face similar dilemmas. According to Bigfork's "very, very preliminary" budget projections, the 1.9 percent increase is not enough to cover even the steps on the employee pay grid, District Clerk Eda Taylor said.

"Another problem we have is enrollment dropped, but not enough to cut a full teacher when you spread it out all over," she said.

Taylor didn't know how short the district's budget might be. According to data collected by the Montana Quality Education Coalition, the elementary district could be short by as much as $86,700.

The high school district could avoid a deficit by passing a levy, but the district already is asking voters to support a bond. Asking for a levy on top of that is unlikely, Taylor said.

Whitefish may be in the same boat, District Clerk Danelle Reisch said. The district is asking voters to approve a $21.5 million high school bond. It is not asking for a levy.

"At this point, I'm not positive that we'll be able to run a levy," she said.

While bonds and levies are separate issues - bonds are for buildings, not annual operations - taxpayers don't always see the difference. Both increase annual property taxes.

Enrollment in Whitefish is down slightly, which will impact next year's general fund budget. Whitefish's seventh- and eighth-grade classes have been small in recent years, Reisch said, which is having a significant impact on the overall budget.

"We've had some pretty small classes now hitting the high school," she said. "It's nothing that we haven't expected."

The district will have a better idea of what it faces after its spring enrollment figures are in.

"But based on our October numbers, it's not a pretty picture," Reisch said.

Kalispell Public Schools is the exception to the rule. It added about 180 elementary students and about 60 high school students this fall, which will increase the districts' per-student funding next year.

The elementary budget could go up by almost $1 million, District Clerk Todd Watkins said, and the high school funds could increase by $400,000 to $500,000.

"If we don't have to add a bunch of staff, we'll be OK for a year," he said. "Then it'll be interesting after that - but we'll have a legislative session coming up."

Legislators did approve more than $100 million in new education funds this year.

"The Legislature and the governor have done a good job of providing us with money recently," Nicosia said. "We've received more money these last couple of legislative sessions than we've received total since 1991."

While schools are grateful for those funds, he said, many of them are earmarked for specific programs.

"They haven't solved the underfunding problem," Nicosia said. "They've just added another program."

They are good programs, he said, and schools are glad to have money to operate them. But those earmarked funds - like the money to implement full-day kindergarten - are one-time only. They help schools start the programs, Nicosia said, but do nothing to help them maintain them.

"Our hope is that we can get the message out to enough people, and that those people who are concerned about education in Montana will be able to convince the Legislature and the governor that we need a special session," he said.

Reporter Kristi Albertson may be reached at 758-4438 or by e-mail at kalbertson@dailyinterlake.com

Welcome to the discussion.

7 comments:

  • mtboat

    mtboat Posts: 3

    I have asked this question before and got no response. I try again. Do we have too many administrators in the Montana school system? I can't recall where , but I heard we have a excessive amount of administrators compared to other places. Is this true?

     
  • faithful reader

    faithful reader Posts: 47

    I'm ashamed that there are people like kalimom in the Flathead. What makes you think you have the right to dictate how other people contribute to this community? This man's generosity has taken nothing away from you and yet you complain and want something else. Shame on you.

     
  • AK Montanan

    AK Montanan Posts: 0

    My wife was formally a school teacher in the Columbia Falls School District. She had eight years experience and a Master's Degree in Special Education. We left Montana for Alaska because she couldn't find a job in Montana. Montana decided that educating its children is less important than having the most modern snowmachine or satellite TV. That was your decision and the decision of your elected representatives. I am disappointed at having to leave MT. I loved it there but we couldn't make it because of the shortsightedness the legislature and local public has for education. Studies abound suggesting a proper education fuels economic prosperity but MT is still living in the 1950s. OH Well, MT's loss is Alaska's gain. My wife has a great job up here and we are loving it. See ya

     
  • coryaim

    coryaim Posts: 0

    What about the state lottery fund? Or all the money that is spent on gambling every year here in the valley? Where is that money going?

     
  • Kalispell Native

    Kalispell Native Posts: 0

    Interestingly, public schools today receive a lower share of the total tax "burden" than in years past. Think about it. The first tax-funded program in America was when a community decided they needed to pool their resources, build a school and pay the teacher. Schools and staffing numbers have grown, indeed, but look how much you're now paying in Social Security taxes, federal income tax (half of which go to fund military efforts), gasoline taxes, Medicare taxes. School taxes are a drop in the bucket in the average family checkbook compared to these other taxes.

     
  • BettyBoop

    BettyBoop Posts: 0

    I agree with kalimom. When you really think about this donation, you have to stop and ask yourself, is this the best thing for our communitity? How many times in the last five years would it have been used in the crimes here in the valley? We are not L.A. or Seattle, ect... Why not use the money to better our valley in so many other needed areas?

     
  • kalimom

    kalimom Posts: 0

    Good thing we have a new Armored Response Vehicle in Kalispell. Maybe "part time resident" Don Abbey has deep enough pockets to also help our children receive the education they deserve. Probably not though, if our children fall through the cracks there will be more opportunities for his new "BEAR" to be put to use. What's wrong with this picture?

     
default avatar
Welcome to the site! Register or log in below.
   |   
 |  Not You?
Logout  |  My Dashboard

Today's Weather

Kalispell , MT

© Copyright 2009, Daily Inter Lake, Kalispell , MT