Working together had good results on forest plan

Print Article

There’s a lot of bad news about divisiveness in America. Here’s a local good-news story: Folks with very diverse interests in the Flathead Valley met over a 13-month period, got way past “No!” and achieved a unanimous agreement on national forest management.

Sound impossible? No, not really. The Flathead Forest has formally adopted most of the Whitefish Range Partnership’s recommendations in their recently released revised forest plan, proving that local input matters, and that people who work together in good faith can have a positive impact.

The partnership focused exclusively on the Whitefish Range, located north of Whitefish and west of Glacier Park. Our group is composed of nearly 30 members from landowners, business owners, wilderness advocates, motorized recreationists, horsemen, fishermen and women, mountain bikers, timber interests, and wildlife and trails advocates, among others.

The partnership came together early in the Flathead Forest plan revision process. This was the first time that many historically divergent interests in the Flathead sat in the same room together to try and talk it out. In the beginning no one was sure what we were doing or what would come of it. But, after the first few meetings, we were able to define our collective vision for the Whitefish Range and began putting our results on paper.

We worked in sub-committees on 10 subjects ranging from wildland and prescribed fire, to fisheries, weed management, recreation, and more. Experts came and shared information about each topic to inform our work, and keep us within the Forest Service laws and guidelines. Committees reported back to the larger group for further debate and a vote. By our own rules, we had to reach 100 percent consensus on each topic before we could proceed to the next.

So, what’s resulted from this hard work?

In the end, we agreed unanimously to submit our recommendations on 10 subjects to the Forest Service. Everyone felt that by supporting one another, each of our values could be elevated in the planning process for the Whitefish Range. Where and how was timber harvest best? Where are the areas that snowmobiling is important and desired? Where should there be more trails? What special areas should be protected as wilderness? These are examples of the elements of our agreement.

Ultimately, for our partnership to succeed, we need to see a signed forest plan. It’s important that officials in Washington, D.C., allow the Flathead Forest plan to proceed and conclude without top-down interference. The final plan should be signed following the official “objection period” that is currently underway.

Collaborative groups and processes represent the best available opportunities for resolving socially complex, natural resource decision-making. Other Montana-based collaboratives, like the Blackfoot Clearwater Stewardship Project and the Kootenai Forest Stakeholders Coalition, can only succeed if our elected officials and our local decision-makers consider and act on citizen recommendations.

In this period of American history where many people — and many elected officials — seem to think that their point of view is the only point of view, we recommend talking and listening, and coming up with forest plans, community plans, even state and national legislation, that reflects the consensus of the community served.

We wish to thank the Flathead Forest planning staff for taking time, providing resources, and listening to citizens. While the Flathead staff clearly considered other points of view and suggestions for the North Fork Geographic Unit (the Whitefish Range), as reflected in the final plan, the plan also reflects the consensus of the Whitefish Range Partnership.

Robinson of the Montana Wilderness Association and Van Everen of Whitefish Legacy Partners are residents of Whitefish. They were joined in signing this letter by Noah Bodman, Flathead Area Mountain Bikers; Paul McKenzie, F.H. Stoltze Land & Lumber Company; Don Sullivan, North Fork Compact; Bill Walker, North Fork Preservation Association; and Larry Wilson, North Fork landowner.

Print Article

Read More Letters to the Editor

Letters to the editor Oct. 18

October 18, 2018 at 5:00 am | Daily Inter Lake Tester champions Montana women When election season rolls around, it’s hard to know who to trust and what to believe. But Planned Parenthood Action Fund’s endorsement of Senator Jon Tester is an e...

Comments

Read More

Letters to the editor Oct. 15

October 15, 2018 at 5:00 am | Daily Inter Lake Minimum wage I was pleased to see that Amazon has increased its minimum wage for its workers to $15. We have seen the stock market go steadily up in the last year, but have noticed that, although...

Comments

Read More

Rose Crossing inadequate for level of traffic

October 14, 2018 at 10:53 am | Daily Inter Lake I have lived on Rose Crossing since July of 2008. Since moving here, as is the case with most growing communities, I have seen the traffic levels increase on the small country road on which I live. ...

Comments

Read More

The deep state impacting western states

October 14, 2018 at 10:53 am | Daily Inter Lake I note with interest that your publication has chosen to mention the “New Code of the West” conference being held in Whitefish. The conference features Ammon Bundy of recent notoriety for – togethe...

Comments

Read More

Contact Us

(406) 755-7000
727 East Idaho
Kalispell, MT 59901

©2018 Daily Inter Lake Terms of Use Privacy Policy
X
X