Trump’s reversal on transgender troops will hurt the military

Print Article

In a sudden reversal of policy, President Trump recently announced transgendered people would no longer be eligible to serve in the U.S. Armed Forces. Yet, a 2016 RAND study found that the costs of gender-transition-related health care are relatively low, and that allowing them to serve openly has no effect on military readiness. Furthermore, according to estimates, thousands of transgendered people are already serving on active duty.

As a veteran, I am deeply concerned about what this sudden reversal means for our armed forces. After the Pentagon’s end to the ban on transgendered service members last year, many transgendered troops have just come out to their units — only to be told now that they are banned from serving.

At a time when the military’s role around the world is growing, the sudden reversal of policy creates unnecessary disruption, shuns good service members and limits the pool of potential candidates. This is not only a discrimination issue but it also directly affects readiness, national security and morale.

This year at a conference in Washington, I had the pleasure of meeting a high-ranking Department of Defense civilian working in naval intelligence. Born a male, she was finally ready to make the transition to a woman about 10 years ago to the gender she felt she actually was meant to be. The decision was extraordinarily tough as her colleagues were very conservative, and so rather than creating controversy or attracting undue attention, she was prepared to discreetly resign from her hard-earned position. Yet, instead of ostracizing her or agreeing with her decision to resign quietly, the commanding officer listened to her, embraced her situation, and rallied the whole office behind her medical decision. He couldn’t afford to lose her talent, whether she was male or female. Now that is leadership.

For many Americans, there is a huge misunderstanding as to who transgendered people are and what they want. Most transgendered people are hard-working Americans with a serious medical issue that has plagued them throughout their entire life. The medical community is sophisticated enough to address their condition and offer transgendered people a better chance at living a more fulfilling life, while general officers have stated that the military is open to all people, so long as they meet the standard. So why would the president forbid them from serving?

Maye is a former U.S. Air Force officer, defense industry professional, and a member of the Truman National Security Project’s Defense Council. She wrote this for InsideSources.com.

Print Article

Read More Letters to the Editor

Letters published Feb. 21, 2018

February 21, 2018 at 5:00 am | Daily Inter Lake Tester playing politics with budget, DACA? Democrats touted how they wanted a “clean” DACA bill. But then they shut down the government by not approving interim funding in order to blackmail the cit...

Comments

Read More

Taking a cold, hard look at mass killings

February 18, 2018 at 5:00 am | Daily Inter Lake As a parent, I am terrified of the idea that my daughter’s life, or any child’s life, could be in danger at school. I’m heartbroken for the parents who lost children, students who lost friends, and...

Comments

Read More

Guns are not responsible for murder — people are

February 18, 2018 at 5:00 am | Daily Inter Lake I feel it might be timely to remind everyone that the only time a gun is an “assault” weapon is when it’s used to assault. When used to defend, well, guess what — it’s a “defense” weapon. I want to b...

Comments

Read More

The safety of our children and communities

February 18, 2018 at 5:00 am | Daily Inter Lake Washington, D.C. is broken. Our representatives choose time and again to bend to the interests of lobbyists and corporate donors at our expense. I have spent my entire career as a consumer protec...

Comments

Read More

Contact Us

(406) 755-7000
727 East Idaho
Kalispell, MT 59901

©2018 Daily Inter Lake Terms of Use Privacy Policy
X
X