Whitefish OKs nondiscrimination measure

Print Article

The Whitefish City Council, trying to support diversity in the community while protecting First Amendment rights to free speech, unanimously approved a nondiscrimination resolution Monday night.

Council member Frank Sweeney said the resolution demonstrates the hopes and values for the city.

“We need to remain attentive and vigilant to what might happen and who might come into our community,” he said. “No resolution, no law, can prospectively eliminate those problems.”

“Nobody here has any intention to inhibit free speech,” he added. “Diversity of ideas is a fine thing. The value of those ideas is something we all have to make up our minds about.”

The resolution declares the city’s intent “to take a stance in support of diversity, inclusion, free speech, and freedom of assembly for all inhabitants and visitors; and condemn ideologies, philosophies and movements that deny a quality of human rights and opportunities and challenge our constitutional freedoms granted by the United States and the state of Montana.”

Following approval of the resolution, the packed council chamber erupted in applause.

The resolution came in response to a Nov. 17 rally organized by Love Lives Here, a local affiliate of the Montana Human Rights Network. The group asked the city to create legislation prohibiting hate organizations from doing businesses or having offices in Whitefish, and specifically pointed to Whitefish resident Richard Spencer, president of the white nationalist “think tank” National Policy Institute.

In a Nov. 19 column in the Whitefish Pilot, Love Lives Here founder Ina Albert said the group was requesting a no-hate ordinance.

“Please help us show people like Spencer and groups like National Policy Institute that they’re not welcome here,” she wrote.

However, on Monday representatives of Love Lives Here told the council they want to protect the expression of the ideas they disagree with while also advocating for the passage of a nondiscrimination resolution.

“We want to emphasize that Love Lives Here will not deny freedom of speech to anyone,” Albert said. “Love Lives Here stands for everybody being included in the community, even those who preach [hate] doctrine. What we can’t abide are our right to free speech by standing silent.”

Spencer told the council he was the target of a “witch hunt” when Love Lives Here rallied against his residency in Whitefish, but added that since then “cooler heads have prevailed.”

“I give my enthusiastic endorsement to this resolution that confirms community values and encourages diversity,” Spencer said. “It is vague, but I concur with its spirit. Real diversity includes thinking differently.”

“I will take this resolution as a good faith gesture,” he said. “I’m going to take it as a kind of apology — an assertion that people in this community who think differently will not be subjected to the mentality I have over the past few weeks.”

For the second meeting in a row, more than 100 people filled the council chambers to voice opinions on the matter. But this time the conversation was mixed — several people advocated for ultimate protection of free speech, others backed away from requesting a no-hate ordinance, saying they merely want to rally against hate ideals, and some applauded the creation of the nondiscrimination resolution.

Joe Coco said he doesn’t support Spencer and he’s not against Love Lives Here.

“I’m an advocate for freedom of speech and the First Amendment,” he said. “I believe in the right of anybody to speak what they believe.”

Coco, who has a long family history of military service, said he is “embarrassed” at the thought of living in a community that would pass a law taking away free speech.

“Be careful not to pass a bad law because you’ll be required to enforce it,” he said.

Jeremy Palmer said it’s dangerous to ban one person’s ideas just because they aren’t in line with certain beliefs.

“The problem is when we start being intolerant to certain ideas — they might be wrong today, but not tomorrow,” he said.

Rabbi Allen Secher disputed the idea that Love Lives Here is advocating for a ban on free speech.

“I didn’t hear anyone say we wanted to deny the right to speak,” he said. “We have fear — not for what’s said, but for what’s done.”

In a memo to the council, City Attorney Mary VanBuskirk said “while the city retains authority to enact laws on behalf of the health, safety and general welfare of its citizens, its authority to regulate is not absolute.”

VanBuskirk said that if the city enacts a no-hate ordinance focused only on prohibiting certain speech or expression believed to be hateful, the city would be violating First Amendment rights to free speech.

Brian Muldoon said the battle remains with the citizens to push out ideas that are “corrosive.”

“The First Amendment prohibits the government from preventing speech,” he said. “It doesn’t stop me from speaking out against something I disagree with.”

“Yes, there are ideas that can’t be tolerated,” he added. “We will chose who we will and will not be neighbors with.”

The city noted that the resolution isn’t intended to alter other “rights, protections, or privileges secured by state or federal law, including state and federal constitutional protections of freedom of speech, assembly, and exercise of religion.”

In a memo to council, City Attorney Mary VanBuskirk said “while the city retains authority to enact laws on behalf of the health, safety and general welfare of its citizens, its authority to regulate is not absolute.”

VanBuskirk said that if the city enacts a no-hate ordinance focused only on prohibiting certain speech or expression believed to be hateful, the city would be violating First Amendment rights to free speech.

An agenda item later in the meeting gave council members the opportunity for further discussion of creating a no-hate or nondiscrimination ordinance. No council members indicated a desire to discuss the matter.

Print Article

Read More Local News

Commercial subdivision OK’d at Silverbrook

July 17, 2018 at 5:46 pm | Daily Inter Lake Kalispell City Council on Monday gave final approval to a two-lot commercial subdivision at the north end of the city where Silverbrook meets Church Drive. The project received unanimous support ...

Comments

Read More

No serious injuries in 3-vehicle wreck on Highway 206

July 17, 2018 at 5:45 pm | Daily Inter Lake There were no serious injuries in a three-vehicle wreck on Highway 206 late Sunday morning, according to Montana Highway Patrol. Patrol Sergeant Duane Bowers said nine people were involved, but only...

Comments

Read More

Anonymous $2.5M gift to FVCC honors McClaren

July 17, 2018 at 9:32 am | Daily Inter Lake Flathead Valley Community College is $2.5 million closer to fully funding its new College Center on campus, thanks to an anonymous gift made to the college in honor and memory of FVCC founder Bill Mc...

Comments

Read More

Wildfire in Kootenai was sparked by lightning storm a month ago

July 17, 2018 at 3:28 pm | Daily Inter Lake A small lightning-caused wildfire in the Kootenai National Forest doubled in size Tuesday. The Zulu Fire north of Libby near Zulu Creek was estimated at about 20 acres Tuesday morning. It is the fir...

Comments

Read More

Contact Us

(406) 755-7000
727 East Idaho
Kalispell, MT 59901

©2018 Daily Inter Lake Terms of Use Privacy Policy
X
X