Has climate agenda run out of steam?

Print Article

I got an e-mail from Democratic lobbyist John Podesta last week that began “Dear Friend,” so I knew it had arrived at my inbox by accident.

Podesta was the last chief of staff during the Bill Clinton presidency, and is currently the chair of the Center for American Progress, which as you can tell by the name is one of those groups trying to undermine our nation’s values and traditions under the guise of marching us into the 21st century’s version of “1984.” (Are we there yet?)

Personally, I would rather march into the gulag and rot in chains for the rest of my life while thanking God for the liberty our Founding Fathers had bequested us than to spend even one minute in the mental prison known as progressivism.

But that’s just me.

My “dear friend” John Podesta has a different idea. He and his comrades think we are making progress the more we chip away at the bedrock of the Constitution, so that our liberties are replaced with guarantees. Under the progressive framework, instead of being free to fail, we are guaranteed to succeed. Whereas the original Constitution was supposed to protect us as individuals against an over-reaching government, the reshaped progressive Constitution is supposed to empower government to reach into every aspect of our lives — religion, health care, personal beliefs — and reshape them according to the world view of those who “know better” than us. I can’t remember if it was Nietzsche who called such people our “overlords” or not, but if he didn’t he should have.

One of the best levers the progressives have found to muscle us toward more and bigger government is the issue of climate change, formerly known as global warming. After all, as individuals we are powerless to change the weather, but progressives have convinced us that if we all pull together (and stop barbecuing ribs!) we will be able to harness Mother Nature. Such true believers are just as deluded as the advisers of King Canute who thought he could stop the tide just by commanding it to do so.

Fortunately for King Canute, he could prove the futility of this delusion simply by putting his chair at the edge of the sea, uttering his command to the waters to halt, and then waiting until his feet got wet. For the modern world, however, we would have to spend trillions of dollars in equipment modifications, new technology and “carbon trading” before we finally had to admit that we were just as warm as when we started.

In the meantime, the progressive “overlords” know darn well that climate change cannot be “regulated” like health care, but they see it as a gigantic cudgel to force society to change its behavior in ways big and small to better suit the progressive agenda.

Maybe the enormity of the challenge of any kind of global change has finally started to sink in though, because recent trends in both science and popular opinion have tended to minimize the alarmism about global warming (oops! I mean climate change!).

So much so that apparently both the New York Times and Washington Post have, in the words of Mr. Podesta, “gutted their coverage of climate change.” He calls these independent shifts in reporting priorities “some of the most block-headed decisions of all time.”

I call them a welcome change, but I am pretty confident that Podesta and the Center for American Progress would call me much worse than a block-head if they knew I still supported the Constitution, liberty and common sense. Heck, I even support global warming, since I prefer it to the alternative — thousand-foot-deep glaciers covering my home in Northwest Montana the way they did at the end of the last ice age 13,000 years ago.

But I have a feeling John and I will not be talking anytime soon. If he is mad at the New York Times just for shutting down its Green Blog and closing its environmental desk, then he is going to be absolutely furious with me for exposing the progressive agenda for using climate change as a steppingstone to complete social transformation.

Indeed, when John hears about this column, I suppose it will be the end of a beautiful friendship.

Print Article

Read More Frank Miele: Editor's 2 Cents

EDITOR’S 2 CENTS: Trump’s war with CIA was preceded by Kennedy’s

March 18, 2017 at 8:27 pm | Daily Inter Lake The New York Times, in a front-page story, said that the president “wanted to splinter the CIA in a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds.” Whether that quote is accurate or not we don’t kno...

Comments

Read More

EDITOR’S 2 CENTS: Donald Trump, Huxley and the ‘enemies of freedom’

March 11, 2017 at 7:20 pm | Daily Inter Lake It was the tweet heard round the world. “The FAKE NEWS media (failing @nytimes, @NBCNews, @ABC, @CBS, @CNN) is not my enemy, it is the enemy of the American People!” —Donald Trump, via Twitter, Fe...

Comments

Read More

EDITOR’S 2 CENTS: Learning about race from the good folks of the Flathead

March 04, 2017 at 8:58 pm | Daily Inter Lake It’s been an unexpected pleasure to get to do part of the reporting on the Inter Lake’s series on black history in the Flathead, and as we wind up the series today, I wanted to reflect on some of w...

Comments

Read More

EDITOR’S 2 CENTS: ‘Black in the Flathead’: The evolution of a DIL news project

February 25, 2017 at 6:49 pm | Daily Inter Lake One year ago in January, I was a guest in the Museum at Central School’s John White Speakers Series, where I participated in a panel discussion on “Flathead News.” That heady topic could lead any ...

Comments

Read More

X